Saturday, 9 February 2013

Seven Psychopaths (Dir - Martin McDonagh 2012)

Summary: A struggling screenwriter inadvertently becomes entangled in the Los Angeles criminal underworld after his oddball friends kidnap a gangster's beloved Shih Tzu. 

Sometimes it's ok for a film to do exactly what is says on the tin. Walken is Walken, Rockwell was Rockwell, Farrell was Farrell and Harrelson was Harrelson and you know what? It was great. The summary above covers pretty much the whole plot, there are twists but they are abit predictable but there are enough giggles to see you through.
This film isn't breaking any boundaries or bringing anything new to the table but I thought it was really enjoyable.

Overall: Good comedy/rubbish triller 7/10

Silver Linings Playbook (Dir - David O. Russell 2012)

Summary: After a stint in a mental institution, former teacher Pat Solitano moves back in with his parents and tries to reconcile with his ex-wife. Things get more challenging when Pat meets Tiffany, a mysterious girl with problems of her own.

Ooo I love a rom-com, it's like my shameful little secret and if I have a girlie cry all the better. Silver Linings is a lovely quirky story in the same vein as Juno and I thought it was honestly charming.
Bradley Cooper and Jennifer Lawerence are great and I really enjoyed the supporting cast. I laughed, I cried and I got angry which is all I want from a rom-com but it did get a little Strictly Ballroom towards the end. I also must point out that the only big problem I had with this was De Niro playing an Irish American with a Itailian American accent, I know I'm nitpicking.

Overall: Russell you have redeemed yourself for the awfulness of The Fighter 8/10

Life of Pi (Dir - Ang Lee 2012)

Summary: A young man who survives a disaster at sea is hurtled into an epic journey of adventure and discovery. While cast away, he forms an unexpected connection with another survivor ... a fearsome Bengal tiger. 

Well this was just not my cup of tea and know lots of people who have seen this and enjoyed it but it wasn't for me. I enjoyed the first part before the boat journey, I thought it was setting up to be a really interesting bio pic exploring religion but it just turning into a weird unbelievable fastasy.
I didn't like the cgi, everything just seemed too hyper really/over the top and lets face it the tiger would have just eaten him.

Overall: Maybe it would have been better if he had been eaten by the tiger 6/10

Friday, 8 February 2013

Les Misérables (Dir - Tom Hooper 2012)

Summary: In 19th-century France, Jean Valjean, who for decades has been hunted by the ruthless policeman Javert after he breaks parole, agrees to care for factory worker Fantine's daughter, Cosette. The fateful decision changes their lives forever.

I am under strict instructions from one of my work colleagues not to give Les Mis a bad review (she has been listening to the soundtrack on repeat for a month now), well I'm not sure if this is going to be a bad review but it will be honest.

I'll start by confessing that I love musicals, Singing in the Rain and The Wizard of Oz are 2 of my favourite all time films and I admit I was obsessed with Chitty Chitty Bang Bang and Summer Holiday as a child. I was not put off by all the lines in Les Mis being sung but it is a little strange to begin with as I was familiar with a musical style where conversations build up to a song rather than the lines flowing directly into song. I think the easiest way to review Les Mis is in a pros and cons list because otherwise it will take too long to write.

Cons
Russell Crows Singing.
Why is Ann Hathaway nominated for so many awards when she is only in 30 minutes of the film?
It's too long.
The film is just general film award fodder.
For some reason after watching this I had the La Resistance song from South Park: Bigger, Longer & Uncut (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xKvdlSLbrCostuck) in my head for days.

Pros
Hugh Jackman (Seriously amazing)
Helena Bonham Carter and Sasha Baron Cohen

Overall: This score is all for Hugh Jackman - 7/10

Sunday, 3 February 2013

Beasts of the Southern Wild (Dir - Benh Zeitlin. 2012)

Summary: Faced with both her hot-tempered father's fading health and melting ice-caps that flood her ramshackle bayou community and unleash ancient aurochs, six-year-old Hushpuppy must learn the ways of courage and love.

Does anyone else know this feeling; you're watching a film and you know it's good and you want to like it but you just don't? Well this is my feelings on Beasts of the Southern Wild. The acting is good, the set perfectly fitting, the story intriguing and the directing fine but it just couldn't hold my attention. It reminded my in parts to Where the Wild Things Are although with a greater grounding in reality and there is nothing wrong with it, it just wasn't for me. I don't really have anything more to say about it.

Overall: just abit meh in my opinion but everyone else seems to like it 5/10

Thursday, 31 January 2013

West of Memphis (Dir - Amy J. Berg. 2012)


Summary: An examination of a failure of justice in the case against the West Memphis Three.

As many people may know I will watch a documentary about anything which, to be honest is not always a good thing. The problem with my enthusiasm for documentaries is that I don’t always check what a documentary is about before watching them and this was the case with West of Memphis. For some reason when I sat down to watch West of Memphis I thought it was going to be a music documentary so was a little miffed when it came apparent it was yet another documentary about the Memphis 3. I mean don’t get me wrong the wrongful conviction and  freedom of the Memphis 3 is a very worthy topic but hasn’t this subject matter been covered enough in the 3 Paradise Lost films and the hundreds of TV interviews? Even Damien Echols (one of the Memphis 3) says during the course of the film that there are many cases like his in America and he finds it strange that so much media focus has been given to the Memphis 3  and I can’t help but agree with Echols.

West of Memphis is not a bad documentary and is very different from the Paradise Lost trilogy. Where as the Paradise Lost series was filmed as the time events happened (1st – The Memphis 3’s initial conviction, 2nd – their appeal and 3rd – their freedom), West of Memphis has the benefit of reflection, gives a distanced perspective and has a well-rounded narrative. The problem I have with West of Memphis is that it does sometimes come across as a vehicle for all of the Memphis 3’s famous supporters (Eddie Vedder, Henry Rollins, Peter Jackson and Johnny Depp to name a few) to appear on film to tell the world about their support and how nice they were to give money/raise money for the cause and how they always believed the 3 were innocent.

West of Memphis did include things I did appreciate such as the opinions of different medical examiners, the debunking of the cult killing theory and the private investigation into Terry Hobbs. I felt that the film effectively highlighted that the real offenders of the Robin Hood Hills murders will never be brought to justice.

Overall: If you have never heard or the Memphis 3 this is all you need to know but if you have watched all the Paradise Lost Trilogy, West of Memphis isn't really bringing anything new to the table. 6/10

Wednesday, 30 January 2013

Django Unchained (Dir - Quentin Tarantino. 2012)


Summary: With the help of a German bounty hunter, a freed slave sets out to rescue his wife from a brutal Mississippi plantation owner. 
 
Slightly different format review; this is a text conversation about Django Unchained I had with my Mam. I had seen Django Unchained with my friend Mary the night befor, after which Mary and I had a very thorough post film dissection and everything we discussed I have basically condensed into the review I messaged to my Mam. I also like that me and my Mam appear to have completely different opinions of the film.
 


Overall: My opinion was that it was fairly rubbish. Tarantino hasn't produced a good film since Jackie Brown but Django did manage to get a few laughs out of me. 5/10

The Master (Dir - Paul Thomas Anderson. 2012)

Summary: A Naval veteran arrives home from war unsettled and uncertain of his future until he is tantalized by The Cause and its charismatic leader. 

I really try not to read reviews until I’ve seen a film myself, I mean yeah if I stumble upon Mark Kermode reviewing something on TV I can’t help but watching it but I don’t actively hunt reviews out until after I‘ve seen them. I hadn’t seen/read any reviews for The Master other than a short plot summary which to be honest didn’t give me high hopes, I mean how could anything top There Will Be Blood and why would I enjoy a film exploring the relationship between an Alcoholic and a Cult Leader. I also had the suspicion that I would love Joaquin Phoenix’s character and hate Philip Seymore Hoffman’s role and generally just couldn’t see this working. Well I can honestly say after watching The Master that all my presumptions were wrong and this is a powerhouse of a film.
From the off I hated Phoenix’s character Freddie, everything about Fred is off and unnerving, his actions seem slimy, aggressive and sickly, his posture is wiry and hunched like some evil is eating him from the inside out. Freddie has all the nasty dislikeable qualities of a Bukowski character but with non of the charm and Phoenix is so convincing, committed and awesome in the role I couldn’t help but smile and continue to do so pretty much throughout the whole film.
The story is about being trapped, one by circumstance (the psychological after effects of war) and one by his own creation (by being the leader of a cult he has founded).  I honestly cannot stop thinking about this film, I watched it over 4 weeks ago now and I really cannot articulate how good it is. Not all the best films are based on likable characters and sometimes what makes a film great is that you hate the main characters with passion.

Overall: I want to take you on a slow boat to China. 10/10