Summary: Faced with both her hot-tempered father's fading health and melting ice-caps that flood her ramshackle bayou community and unleash ancient aurochs, six-year-old Hushpuppy must learn the ways of courage and love.
Does anyone else know this feeling; you're watching a film and you know it's good and you want to like it but you just don't? Well this is my feelings on Beasts of the Southern Wild. The acting is good, the set perfectly fitting, the story intriguing and the directing fine but it just couldn't hold my attention. It reminded my in parts to Where the Wild Things Are although with a greater grounding in reality and there is nothing wrong with it, it just wasn't for me. I don't really have anything more to say about it.
Overall: just abit meh in my opinion but everyone else seems to like it 5/10
Watching all the films that might be/are nominated for Film Awards so you don't have to. Every year I go a little film award season crazy and try to watch as many films which I think will be nominated, try to guess what will win and discover which ones are really rubbish. There will be spelling, grammar mistakes and no doubt opinions noone else will agree with. If anyone can be bothered to read this please let me know your opinions.
Sunday, 3 February 2013
Thursday, 31 January 2013
West of Memphis (Dir - Amy J. Berg. 2012)
Summary: An
examination of a failure of justice in the case against the West Memphis Three.
As many
people may know I will watch a documentary about anything which, to be honest
is not always a good thing. The problem with my enthusiasm for documentaries is
that I don’t always check what a documentary is about before watching them and
this was the case with West of Memphis. For some reason when I sat down to
watch West of Memphis I thought it was going to be a music documentary so was a
little miffed when it came apparent it was yet another documentary about the
Memphis 3. I mean don’t get me wrong the wrongful conviction and freedom of the Memphis 3 is a very worthy
topic but hasn’t this subject matter been covered enough in the 3 Paradise Lost
films and the hundreds of TV interviews? Even Damien Echols (one of the Memphis
3) says during the course of the film that there are many cases like his in
America and he finds it strange that so much media focus has been given to the
Memphis 3 and I can’t help but agree
with Echols.
West of
Memphis is not a bad documentary and is very different from the Paradise
Lost trilogy. Where as the Paradise Lost series was filmed as the time events
happened (1st – The Memphis 3’s initial conviction, 2nd –
their appeal and 3rd – their freedom), West of Memphis has the
benefit of reflection, gives a distanced perspective and has a well-rounded
narrative. The problem I have with West of Memphis is that it does sometimes
come across as a vehicle for all of the Memphis 3’s famous supporters (Eddie
Vedder, Henry Rollins, Peter Jackson and Johnny Depp to name a few) to appear
on film to tell the world about their support and how nice they were to give
money/raise money for the cause and how they always believed the 3 were
innocent.
West of
Memphis did include things I did appreciate such as the opinions of different medical
examiners, the debunking of the cult killing theory and the private
investigation into Terry Hobbs. I felt that the film effectively highlighted
that the real offenders of the Robin Hood Hills murders will never be brought
to justice.
Overall: If
you have never heard or the Memphis 3 this is all you need to know but if you
have watched all the Paradise Lost Trilogy, West of
Memphis isn't really bringing anything new to the table. 6/10
Wednesday, 30 January 2013
Django Unchained (Dir - Quentin Tarantino. 2012)
Summary: With the help of a German bounty hunter, a freed slave sets out to rescue his wife from a brutal Mississippi plantation owner.
Overall: My opinion was that it was fairly rubbish. Tarantino hasn't produced a good film since Jackie Brown but Django did manage to get a few laughs out of me. 5/10
The Master (Dir - Paul Thomas Anderson. 2012)
I really try not to read reviews until I’ve seen a film myself, I mean yeah if I stumble upon Mark Kermode reviewing something on TV I can’t help but watching it but I don’t actively hunt reviews out until after I‘ve seen them. I hadn’t seen/read any reviews for The Master other than a short plot summary which to be honest didn’t give me high hopes, I mean how could anything top There Will Be Blood and why would I enjoy a film exploring the relationship between an Alcoholic and a Cult Leader. I also had the suspicion that I would love Joaquin Phoenix’s character and hate Philip Seymore Hoffman’s role and generally just couldn’t see this working. Well I can honestly say after watching The Master that all my presumptions were wrong and this is a powerhouse of a film.
From the off I hated Phoenix’s character Freddie, everything about Fred is off and unnerving, his actions seem slimy, aggressive and sickly, his posture is wiry and hunched like some evil is eating him from the inside out. Freddie has all the nasty dislikeable qualities of a Bukowski character but with non of the charm and Phoenix is so convincing, committed and awesome in the role I couldn’t help but smile and continue to do so pretty much throughout the whole film.
The story is about being trapped, one by circumstance (the psychological after effects of war) and one by his own creation (by being the leader of a cult he has founded). I honestly cannot stop thinking about this film, I watched it over 4 weeks ago now and I really cannot articulate how good it is. Not all the best films are based on likable characters and sometimes what makes a film great is that you hate the main characters with passion.
Overall: I want to take you on a slow boat to China. 10/10
Sunday, 2 December 2012
Anna Karenina (Dir - Joe Wright. 2012)
Summary: Set in late-19th-century Russia high-society, the aristocrat Anna Karenina enters into a life-changing affair with the affluent Count Vronsky.
This film is beautiful, the set is mostly based on a theatre building, with different parts of the theatre becoming differently locations, it is very clever, I just wish the performances had been as good as the set design. Anyway lets start with the good; I quite enjoyed Jude Law’s performance and it was nice to finally see him play a part where he didn’t have to hide his receding hairline. Aaron Taylor-Johnson was convincing as the womanising Vronsky and I really felt his role mature by the end of the film. Overall I enjoyed the supporting cast (Matthew Macfadyen, Kelly Macdonald & Domhnall Gleeson) but what spoiled it all was Keira Knightley. Now I don’t normally mind Knightley, I usually quiet like her in period dramas as I think she has an innocence and vulnerability that works well but the role of Anna Karenina was meant to convey love, passion, conflict and madness but all I got was a wet blanket. Thinking back to this, I think I would have preferred it with a different leading lady, maybe Emily Blunt would have been a good choice following her performance in The Young Victoria. I don’t know, Anna Karenina seemed full of promises which it failed to deliver.
Overall: It was stunning but it needed a better leading lady 5/10
Paranorman (Dir - Chris Butler & Sam Fell. 2012)
Summary: A misunderstood boy takes on ghosts, zombies and grown-ups to save his town from a centuries-old curse.
I was disappointed with Paranorman; the animation was brilliant, the idea was interesting and I thought it had everything that would made a good kids film that adults would enjoy as well but I was wrong.
Firstly the plot was a little weak and the script lulled in parts. Secondly it just seemed to long, it either needed the story to be padded out more or needed a secondary sub-plot to up the pacing (yes I know this is pretty much the same as my first point but this issue really has to be highlighted). Lastly I felt there were too many references to classic horror films to make it accessible to children, yes the adults in the audiences will appreciate them but the kids will miss the joke and feel left out.
Overall: Disappointing but very pretty 6/10
I was disappointed with Paranorman; the animation was brilliant, the idea was interesting and I thought it had everything that would made a good kids film that adults would enjoy as well but I was wrong.
Firstly the plot was a little weak and the script lulled in parts. Secondly it just seemed to long, it either needed the story to be padded out more or needed a secondary sub-plot to up the pacing (yes I know this is pretty much the same as my first point but this issue really has to be highlighted). Lastly I felt there were too many references to classic horror films to make it accessible to children, yes the adults in the audiences will appreciate them but the kids will miss the joke and feel left out.
Overall: Disappointing but very pretty 6/10
Magic Mike (Dir - Steven Soberbergh. 2012)
How did this get any good reviews? I guessed the whole plot within 10 minutes and does anyone really find Matthew McConaughey attractive? It has non of the charm of The Full Monty or Coyote Ugly and all of the horrible in your face-ness of Striptease or Showgirls. Soberbergh has not done a good film since Traffic and even though I was ill while watching this it was still a massive waste of time.
Overall: Please don’t watch this. Predictable and bad throughout, Channing Tatum and Joe Manganiello's abs are honestly not worth the effort 2/10
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)